Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. Industrial Commission

LARSON, Justice.

Plaintiff filed petition for rehearing, claiming that the opinion erred in two particulars : First, in the statement that there was no- question raised as to Wi-nget feeing excluded from benefits by provisions (a), (b) and (c> of Sec. 19.(j) (5) of the- Act; Second, that we did not discuss plaintiff’s liability to pay taxes under the Act on all its agents in Utah operating under contract 72, or other contracts, substantially similar, except for varying amounts of commissions. The court deems, it advisable to note briefly these points. As to the first point, we quote now from…