Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Durso v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1983Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kassal, J. (dissenting in part, concurring in part).

The jury’s verdict in the amount of $700,000 in favor of the injured plaintiff, Frank Durso, and in the amount of $300,000, for his wife, Catherine Durso, for her derivative cause of action for loss of services, should be set aside and a new trial ordered as a result of (1) the court’s improper instructions to the jury; (2) the unbalanced marshaling of the evidence in the court’s charge; and (3) because the said verdicts are grossly excessive. Plaintiff suffered from a chronic back condition, both prior and subsequent to the September 6,1975…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blaize v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Theodoropoulos v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Gilhooly v. PiciocchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Kissner v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API