Donald Earl Young v. State

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Donald Young appeals his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol. He contends that the district court erred in permitting the State to introduce expert testimony involving retrograde extrapolation to prove that Mr, Young's blood aleohol level was above 0.08% while he was driving on the night in question. 1 We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] The issue to be resolved, as set forth by the State, is whether the district court committed plain error when it allowed the State to introduce retrograde extrapolation evidence.

FACTS

[¶8] On the evening of August 1, 2014, Lanette…