Legal Opinion

King v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1964No. 8344PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

On September 30, 1963, plaintiff Anna Maydeen King instituted this action hy the filing of her petition for separate maintenance. On the next day, defendant Everett King filed his answer and cross-hill, in which he sought a decree of divorce a vinculo matrimonii, i. e., an absolute divorce, on the sole statutory ground that plaintiff Maydeen “[had] absented * * * herself without a reasonable cause for the space of one year” [V.A.M.S. § 452.010], which is “the legal equivalent of ‘desertion’ as defined in textbooks and reported cases” [Nolker v. Nolker, Mo. (banc), 257 S.W. 798,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Price v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Wilson v. Motors Insurance CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Davis v. BroughtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Dwyer v. DwyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hardin v. RayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. M.F.A. Central Cooperative v. HarrillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Roberts v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Tellmann v. Civil Service Commission of St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API