Legal Opinion

United States v. Da-Chuan Zheng, Kuang-Shin Lin, Jing-Li Zhang, David Tsai, Allen Yeung

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 27, 1985No. 84-5693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

The government contends that in dismissing an indictment the district court adopted an unduly restrictive definition of the word “items.” The term appears in a statute that requires the President to designate “items” to be included on a list of defense articles whose sale and exportation are restricted. We conclude that the list as prepared by the Executive complied with the congressional direction. We will therefore vacate the district court’s order.

In a one count indictment, defendants were charged with having conspired to violate the Arms Export…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Barrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Campos-SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Rao GollapudiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Veriha v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. United States v. GeisslerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  4. Joseph Veriha and Christina F. Veriha v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  5. United States v. GollapudiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API