Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Clement

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1920No. 9216Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

The evidence showed that the dome cap was loosened by the joint efforts of plaintiff and Porter who used a Stilson wrench for that purpose. Appellee’s motion for rehearing contains the following:

“This honorable court, as well as the jury, found that one of the causes of the explosion and the consequent injury was the act of the appellee in loosening the dome cap. Granting this to be true, and granting that the appellee was guilty of contributory negligence as found by the jury in loosening this dome cap, then this honorable court cannot escape the proposition that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alamo Oil & Refining Co. v. CurvierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Lone Star Lignite Mining Co. v. CaddellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API