Legal Opinion

Moreno v. Nationwide Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 23, 1997No. 95-7027PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DUBINA, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a single issue for our consideration: whether a provision in an automobile insurance policy requiring proof of a hit-and-run accident from competent evidence other than the testimony of any insured is in derogation of Alabama’s Uninsured Motorist Statute, Ala.Code § 32-7-23 (1975). To anyone familiar with the concept of federalism, this may appear to be an unusual issue for our court. We originally certified this question to the Alabama Supreme Court for its pronouncement on what is clearly a question of substantive state law; however, the court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Ogle v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. ColtonOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Champion Ins. Co. v. DenneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walker v. GuideOne Specialty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API