Legal Opinion

Holland v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1919No. 939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Palo Pinto County Court; J. T. Ranspot, Judge. Action by M. F. Wood against E. R. Holland and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Holland appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

M. F. Wood brought this suit against S. R. Varner, Mrs. F. M. Watson and her husband, F. M. Watson (the latter joined pro forma), and E. R. Holland to recover on a promissory note, executed by Varner, Mrs. Watson, and Holland, and made payable to the order of appellee, Wood, in the sum of $600, interest, and attorney’s fees, less admitted credits. Varner filed no answer. On a plea of coverture of Mrs. Watson, the suit was dismissed as to both of the Watsons. Holland answered by general demurrer, general denial, arid by plea of noiA esit factum, alleging that he signed the note, but that since…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holland v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sundermeyer v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API