Legal Opinion

State v. Jenkins

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2008No. 49A04-0805-CR-260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

The State appeals the trial court’s grant of Williams Jenkins’ motion to suppress. Specifically, the State contends that because Jenkins, who was arrested for public intoxication and other crimes in the courtyard area of his apartment complex, was intoxicated in a public place, the trial court erred in granting his motion to suppress. We conclude that an outside, unenclosed courtyard area of an apartment complex is sufficiently distinguishable from an interi- or common area of an apartment building such that State v. Culp, 433 N.E.2d 823 (Ind.Ct.App.1982),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. SevierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. CulpIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David Mathews v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Daniel Drake v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. David Mathews v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. George Nichols v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Jason Charles Johnson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API