Knutsen v. Associated Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree in rem against the steamship Golden Gate for the value of fuel oil furnished the vessel by the libelant-appellee. There is no contention that the oil was not in fact delivered, but appellant contends that the - charter party under which the vessel was operating at the time the oil was furnished prohibited the charterer from subjecting the vessel to maritime liens, and that the libelant knew, or by the use of reasonable diligence could have ascertained, that the charterer was without such authority.
The oil was delivered to the vessel in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- The South CoastSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The YankeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- The OceanaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Norwegian Steamship Co. v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Galehead, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. M/v Anglia, in RemCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- The Golden GateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- The AstorianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Clearlake Shipping Pte Ltd. v. O.W. Bunker (Switzerland) SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Valero Marketing & Supply Co. v. M/V Almi Sun, IMO No. 9579535District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.