Curtis v. Shinsachi Pharmaceutical Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [24]
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Olga Curtis and Defendants ShinSachi Pharmaceutical Inc. and Seung-woo Shin are competitors in the rather niche tattoo-numbing-cream market. Curtis has purchased products for resale from Defendants in the past and also sold her own products under the names TAT-TOONUMB, SUPERNUMB, AND DEEPNUMB.
But after Curtis started using those marks, Defendants registered them with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and then sent Curtis’s service providers takedown…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Imposter Pastor Movie, LLC v. OliverDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Moses Choi v. 8th Bridge Capital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Verizon Trademark Services LLC v. Verizon Trademark Services LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Verizon Trademark Services LLC v. Verizon Trademark Services LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024