Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Shinsachi Pharmaceutical Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 9, 2014No. Case No. 2:14-cv-00591-ODW (SSx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [24]

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Olga Curtis and Defendants ShinSachi Pharmaceutical Inc. and Seung-woo Shin are competitors in the rather niche tattoo-numbing-cream market. Curtis has purchased products for resale from Defendants in the past and also sold her own products under the names TAT-TOONUMB, SUPERNUMB, AND DEEPNUMB.

But after Curtis started using those marks, Defendants registered them with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and then sent Curtis’s service providers takedown…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Imposter Pastor Movie, LLC v. OliverDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
  2. Moses Choi v. 8th Bridge Capital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
  3. Verizon Trademark Services LLC v. Verizon Trademark Services LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. Verizon Trademark Services LLC v. Verizon Trademark Services LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API