Legal Opinion

BDO Seidman, LLP v. Banco Espirito Santo International, Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 2009No. 3D07-2472, 3D07-2746, 3D09-197, 3D09-324Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

On Motion and Cross Motion for Review

Banco Espirito Santo International, Ltd., ESB Finance, Ltd., and Banco Espir-ito Santo S.A. (Nassau Branch) (herein, Banco Espirito), the judgment creditors below, seek review of an order denying their request to compel judgment debtor BDO Seidman, LLP (herein, BDO) to comply with post-judgment discovery under section 45.045(3) of the Florida Statutes. On cross motion, BDO maintains that the trial court correctly denied the discovery sought, arguing that BDO Seidman, LLP v. Banco Espirito Santo International Ltd., 998 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Florida Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. State v. EganSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. St. Petersburg Bank & Trust Co. v. HammSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Koile v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. State v. DuganSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API