Legal Opinion

Minnesota Land & Investment Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., presiding, overruling its demurrer to the second defence pleaded in the answer.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

This is an action in ejectment. The plaintiff demurred to one of the defences set forth in the answer, and from an order overruling the demurrer the appeal is taken. The part of the answer demurred to assumes to set forth the facts through which the title claimed by plaintiff was derived from the United States, and the defendant claims that such facts show that no title passed to the railroad company, under which plaintiff claims title. The answer alleges that the land in question is within the ten-mile limit of the grant by congress to aid in the construction of that line of railroad now…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKinney v. BodeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Little v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. O'Connor v. GertgensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Lamprey v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Weeks v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. v. EbilcisorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API