Legal Opinion

State v. Tunick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 30, 2008No. 18262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

959 A.2d 1011 (2008)

289 Conn. 943

STATE of Connecticut

v.

Stephen TUNICK.

No. 18262.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 30, 2008.

Richard Emanuel, New Haven, in support of the petition.

Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn.App. 611, 952 A.2d 103 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the defendant's conviction, without first remanding the case to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether the trial judge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TunickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TunickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API