Legal Opinion

Braverman v. Bendiner & Schlesinger, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 6, 2014No. 2012-00451PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Skelos, J.

In Landon v Kroll Lab. Specialists, Inc., (22 NY3d 1, 6-7 [2013]), the plaintiff sought to recover damages from a drug testing laboratory, alleging that it negligently reported his drug test as positive. The Court of Appeals, in affirming an opinion *355and order of this Court (see Landon v Kroll Lab. Specialists, Inc., 91 AD3d 79 [2011]), recognized that a drug testing laboratory had a duty to the subject of a drug test to adhere to relevant professional standards in performing such testing. The plaintiffs in this case similarly claim that they suffered adverse…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doctor Fred L. Pasternack v. Laboratory Corporation of America HoldingsNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Siskin v. CassarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Scharrer v. Sanders (In re Fundamental Long Term Care., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  4. Birch v. White Way Laundry, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2021
  5. Castillo v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API