Legal Opinion

Mulligan v. City of Hollywood

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 18, 2009No. 4D02-3626Published

1Opinion of the Court

Corrected Opinion On Motion for Rehearing after Remand

2Per curiam

We grant the City’s motion for clarification and substitute the following for our January 28, 2009, opinion. We grant rehearing, withdraw our opinion on remand, 1 and substitute the following in its place. We adopt the analysis and reasoning of the Third District in City of Miami v. Wellman, 976 So.2d 22 (Fla. Bd DCA 2008). We deny the City’s motion for certification.

Initially, the Third District found the notice provision in the comparable vehicle impoundment ordinance insufficient because it failed to require notice to owners of the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. City of Miami v. WellmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API