Legal Opinion

Williams v. Pichard, Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 10, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error brought an action in ejectment against defendants in error, the latter being husband and wife, and the wife’s claim in the disputed premises being limited to her inchoate right of dower. Both parties claimed from a common source of title and in addition the plaintiff claims by adverse possession through deed from Daniel B. Geddie and wife dated September 12, 1901. This appeal is from a final judgment in favor of the defendants.

In empanneling the jury, the trial court allowed the defendants five peremptory challenges. Such allowance is assigned as error.

Section 4359,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watrous v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Schultz v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  3. Bossom v. GillmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  4. Acosta v. GinglesSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  5. State v. BertrandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bailey v. DeverickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Johnson v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Williams v. JohntryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Euse v. GibbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  5. Palm Orange Groves v. YelvingtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API