Legal Opinion
Rancourt v. City of Bangor
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 17, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELAHANTY, Justice.
The plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the Superior Court, sitting in Penobscot County, dismissing their complaint. They contend that their motion to file a supplemental complaint, made pursuant to M.R. Civ.P. 15(d), should have been granted. We agree and sustain the appeal.
The plaintiffs describe themselves as “residents” of the Ohio Street section of Bangor. For many years, the plaintiffs’ neighborhood was classified by the Bangor Zoning Ordinance as an “agricultural” area where the construction of large, multiple-unit apartment houses was forbidden. On June 10, 1974,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Gladys N. Waller, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Superior Insulating Tape Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Thomas v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Cote v. Zoning Board of Appeals for City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bangor Motor Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Hill v. KwanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Chase v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Barkley v. Good Will Home Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Spickler v. Key Bank of Southern MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.