Legal Opinion

Ganesh v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 2, 2024No. 5:22-cv-07708Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 5:16-cr-00211-1 EJD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE CONVICTION UNDER 28 9 v. U.S.C. § 2255 10 VILASINI GANESH, Re: ECF No. 602 11 Defendant. 12 13 Presently before the Court is Defendant Dr. Vilasini Ganesh’s motion to vacate and set 14 aside her conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arising from an alleged deficient Faretta hearing and 15 ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”). ECF No. 602 (“Mot.”). The Government filed its 16 opposition to Dr. Ganesh’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. FariasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Steven AudetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Jonathan ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API