Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carson v. Fishtail Marine of Naples, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 25, 1997No. 96-02383Published

1DissentPatterson, Judge

I respectfully dissent. It appears that both parties thought they had effected a sale. Boat Mart had prepared and delivered two contracts to Carson. Carson had made a deposit, arranged financing at a local bank, and leased a storage facility for the boat. Boat Mart notified the Coast Guard (the boat was to be used for commercial transport of people) that it was selling the boat to Carson. The agreement, however, remained contingent on the boat passing a Coast Guard inspection which never occurred.

My difficulty with the majority’s decision is that this case was disposed of on summary judgment.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Cheezem Development Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Wilson v. WoodwardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Ballas v. SpolyarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API