Legal Opinion
State v. O'DONNELL
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 3, 1968No. 40595PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Wright County finding defendant, James D. O’Donnell, guilty of aggravated forgery.
The facts are as follows: On March 5, 1966, the date of the alleged offense, defendant left his home in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, at approximately 9 a. m. and drove to St. Paul where he began drinking. Before leaving his house, defendant took two pills described as tranquilizers, which had been given him by a cousin. Defendant remained in St. Paul until sometime in the afternoon, consuming between 8 and 10 drinks of vodka and orange…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. BockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- City of Minneapolis v. AltimusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- State v. SaucedoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.