Legal Opinion

Do Vidio v. Do Vidio

New York City Family Court

Decided February 21, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmmett J. Schnepp, J.

The within habeas corpus proceeding, instituted for the custody of three children of the parties, was transferred to this court by the Supreme Court for determination pursuant to article VI of the Family Court Act. The decision herein involves a motion by the petitioner for an order, pursuant to CPLR 408, requiring the respondent to furnish authorizations, permitting petitioner to make copies of all Strong Memorial Hospital records from January, 1963 to date, including out-patiént care and all doctors’ reports incidental thereto, respecting the care, treatment and diagnosis of the respondent.

I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of CoddingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. People ex rel. Chitty v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fisher v. FossettNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Chester v. ZimaNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. O'Leary v. SealeyNassau County District Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perry v. FiumanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. In re ClearNew York City Family Court · 1969
  3. Ace v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Berk v. BerkNew York City Family Court · 1978
  5. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. SoperNew York Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API