Rucker v. Fuller
Illinois Supreme Court
The agreed case, shows that Collins and Kellogg, as also Gordon and Rucker, sued out attachments against one Carlisle, refumable to the September term, 1849, of the Morgan county Circuit Court; which attachments were levied upon real and personal estate, and under them debts were also garnisheed.
Read the full summary
The agreed case, shows that Collins and Kellogg, as also Gordon and Rucker, sued out attachments against one Carlisle, refumable to the September term, 1849, of the Morgan county Circuit Court; which attachments were levied upon real and personal estate, and under them debts were also garnisheed. The Circuit Court to which these attachments were made returnable, stood adjourned, at four of the clock in the afternoon of the second day of the term, under the statute, in consequence of the non-attendance of the Judge. Afterwards, the Judge appointed a special term of the Court, to be held on the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Mr. Justice Trumbull :
These cases came before the Court from Morgan county, upon an agreed state of facts; from which it appears, that writs of attachment were sued out against Carlisle, one at the suit of Rucker & Gordon, and another at the suit of Collins & Kellogg;' and both made returnable to the September term, 1849, of the Morgan Circuit Court. That Carlisle, previous to said term of Court, executed a power of attorney, authorizing the entry of judgment against him, in favor of Davis Fuller, at the September or any subsequent term of said Court. For some cause, the September…
2Cited by8 opinions
- City of Chicago v. CottonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Estate of Jones v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
- Paltzer v. National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Warren v. Iscarian CommunityIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
- Daniels v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.