Legal Opinion
Cantu v. Brink's Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 6, 2016No. 15 C 9240PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SAMUEL DER-YEGHIAYAN, District Judge
This matter is before the court on Defendant The Brink’s Company’s (TBC) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion for summary judgment is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff John Cantu (Cantu) and Plaintiff John Downes (Downes) allegedly each *848worked for TBC. Cantu allegedly worked as an armored car driver and a messenger, and Downes allegedly worked as a messenger. Plaintiffs contend that they were paid overtime for hours worked between 40 and 45 hours, but that they were not paid time and a half for overtime for hours…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- County of McHenry v. Insurance Company of the WestCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gomez v. El-Milagro, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025