Legal Opinion

State v. Englund

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 11, 2014No. 108,446PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAnany, J.:

Mikael Dwayne Englund appeals from his convictions of aggravated burglary and two counts of aggravated robbery, arguing that incriminating evidence obtained in a search of his home and his subsequent confession should have been suppressed and not admitted as evidence at his trial. Englund also argues that his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000).

The Lawrence police were investigating two separate robberies that took place at an apartment in Douglas County. Englund lived in Franklin County. Englund became a suspect, so in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. LambSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. State v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. In re Joint Application of Westar Energy and Kansas Gas and Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API