Legal Opinion

Hertel v. Woodard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, C. J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decree of the circuit court which was entered after the court had sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint and the plaintiff had elected to rely upon that pleading. The demurrer was based upon a contention that the complaint did not aver a cause of suit. The appel lant’s brief states: “Tbe entire controversy between tbe parties can be determined on demurrer.”

According to the complaint, the respondent signed and delivered to the appellant a writing reading as follows: “May 10, 1947.

“Received from Lucky Hertel $80.00 Eighty Dollars earnest money on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bogard v. BarhanOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Henderson v. LemkeOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hyland v. Oregon Agricultural Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Bitney v. GrimOregon Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hink v. BowlsbyOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Evergreen Timber Co. v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Meyer v. KestersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Coast Business Brokers, Inc. v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API