Hertel v. Woodard
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, C. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decree of the circuit court which was entered after the court had sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint and the plaintiff had elected to rely upon that pleading. The demurrer was based upon a contention that the complaint did not aver a cause of suit. The appel lant’s brief states: “Tbe entire controversy between tbe parties can be determined on demurrer.”
According to the complaint, the respondent signed and delivered to the appellant a writing reading as follows: “May 10, 1947.
“Received from Lucky Hertel $80.00 Eighty Dollars earnest money on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bogard v. BarhanOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Henderson v. LemkeOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Hyland v. Oregon Agricultural Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Bitney v. GrimOregon Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Hink v. BowlsbyOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Evergreen Timber Co. v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Meyer v. KestersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Coast Business Brokers, Inc. v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.