Legal Opinion

Holly v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 8, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 99-0225PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

¶ 1 Under A.R.S. § 31-238(D)(1996), the State may set off the cost of incarcerating a prison inmate if the inmate recovers a damage award against the State, but the statute exempts 20 percent of the inmate’s recovery from the setoff. We consider in this appeal whether the statute violates the anti-abrogation clauses of the Arizona Constitution and, if not, whether computation and deduction of the setoff precedes or follows the deduction of the inmate’s attorneys’ fees and costs.

Background

¶2 Plaintiff Charles Holly, an Arizona prison inmate, sued the State for personal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Linder v. Lewis, Roca, Scoville & BeauchampArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gray v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Little v. ALL PHOENIX S. COM. MENT. HLTH.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Raber v. Hongliang WangCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Calhoun v. MidfirstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. Hartman v. State of Washington Department of Children Youth and FamiliesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. McLoughlin Catalina v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API