Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Alexander

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1979No. Docket Nos. 17023, 16890Published

1DissentReynoso, J.

I dissent. In my view, depreciation is to be considered in determining damages for replacing wooden power poles. My conclusion merits further discussion.

P. G. & E. argues that Public Utilities Code section 7952 precludes a depreciation credit for the reasons expressed in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. *257v. Mounteer (1977) 66 Cal.App.3d 809, 812-813 [136 Cal.Rptr. 280], The Mounteer court listed the many problems in determining the depreciation of utility poles: variations in ground and weather conditions, natural disasters, relocation, and underground placement of transmission lines. The court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. MounteerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API