Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Weber v. Farris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1946No. 10834Published

1ConcurrenceHealy, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result.

The orders authorizing appellees to execute a crop mortgage and authorizing them to take possession of the farm were made ex parte. These orders are not ap-pealable under the rule announced by this court in McColgan v. Clark, 4 F.2d 627, followed in Doyle v. Ponsford, 8 Cir., 136 F.2d 401. Compare, also, In re Retail Chemists Corporation, 2 Cir., 66 F.2d 605. As held in the McColgan case, no appeal lies from an ex parte judgment or order in bankruptcy, the remedy being to apply to the court to have the same set aside, and if the application is denied, review may be had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irving Trust Co. v. Climax Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Doyle v. PonsfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. McColgan v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API