Rosier v. Othen
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BOND, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff (appellee) instituted this suit for injunction to restrain defendants (appellants) from interfering with his use of an easement on and 'across the defendants’ land as a way of necessity to and from his home; for mandatory order commanding defendants to remove a dike or levee constructed adjacent to and alongside the roadway, which prevents him and his family from using the roadway or easement; and for damages resulting from such interference and obstruction.
The cause was being submitted to a jury and, at the conclusion of the testimony adduced, all parties agreed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hall v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Stanglin v. LovingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- Othen v. RosierTexas Supreme Court · 1950