Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Co. v. Director of Revenue, State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 2, 1992No. 74140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES SHANGLER, Special Judge.

Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Michigan, operates an international as well as interstate business that includes Missouri. Dow elected to use the three-factor apportionment ratio of the Multistate Tax Compact, § 32.200, art. Ill, IV, RSMo 1986, to derive its Missouri taxable income. In its Missouri tax returns for years 1975 through 1980, Dow excluded from apportionment certain corporate income, deemed as dividends for purposes of federal income tax return. Dow contended that none of the deemed dividend income was derived from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medicine Shoppe International, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  2. Maxland Development Corp. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Director of Revenue v. PennoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API