Legal Opinion

Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Rubber Goods Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Rubber Goods Manufacturing; Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the-, county of New York on the 1st day , of November, 1904, dényingthe defendant’s motion to strike out certain portions of the complaint -as irrelevant, redundant, inconsistent, indefinite and uncertain,, or, in the alternative, to have the complaint made definite and certain in various respects. -

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The action was brought to recover the sum of $200,000 under a. contract, a copy of which is annexed to the complaint, made between the defendant and the American Bicycle Company, New Jersey corporations. The complaint alleges that by the said agreement' the defendant promised and agreed to pay to the American Bicycle-Company the sum of $200,000 annually, so long as the American Bicycle Company should fulfill the terms of the said agreement, for five years from the date of said ■ agreement, the first of said payments to be made at the expiration of one year from the date of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Marjolet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Mitchell Gardens No. 3 Co-Operative Corp. v. Third B N Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Rubber Goods Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API