Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1939No. Nos. 33,912 and 33,913 (Consolidated)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hooh, J.:

Defendants were convicted and sentenced in district court on a charge of grand larceny. Near the close of the trial counsel for defendants offered in evidence a transcript of testimony given at the preliminary hearing by a witness who, he said, was then outside the state. Upon objection, the offer was refused. Refusal to admit the transcript constitutes defendants’ principal assignment of error, and in their brief counsel rely entirely upon it.

Only a brief statement of the facts is needed to define the issue here presented. Defendants, Charles…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. State v. McClellanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. State v. HarmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. State v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. State v. LescoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. State v. CasanovaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API