Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Mowery

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 25, 1983No. 4—82—0537 through 4—82—0539 consPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Miller

I agree with the majority that the circuit court had jurisdiction to enter the contempt order of July 19, 1982, and that the proceedings in the circuit court were flawed. I disagree, however, with the conclusions that the contempt was necessarily civil and that this matter ended with the expiration of the defendant’s term of probation.

The classification of contempts as criminal or civil turns on what kind of sanction — punitive or coercive — is the more appropriate answer to the contemnor’s act. Punishment is imposed when the contemnor affronts the dignity of the court, hinders its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. People Ex Rel. Scott v. SilversteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In re G. B.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Marcisz v. MarciszIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API