Houska v. Frederick
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LAURANCE M. HYDE, Special Commissioner.
Action to reform deeds to change the described boundary line between plaintiffs’ land and land of defendants Sinak, alleged to have been incorrectly described due to mutual mistake of plaintiffs and defendants Frederick who originally owned all of the land. The court found against plaintiffs’ claim, as to the boundary line between their land and the land of the Sinaks, but found a correction should be made in the description of the western boundary described in the deed to them from the Fred-ericks. All parties agree to this change in the western…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- West Investment Co. v. MoorheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Jones v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Calcot Assn. v. Coast Cotton MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Johnson v. Buffalo School District No. 1Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kropp v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Chrysler Corporation v. Fedders Corporation, Salvatore Giordano, Sr., Salvatore Giordano, Jr., Bruno Giordano, Ignatius MacBrinn and Howard S. ModlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Procacci v. ZaccoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Birdsong v. BydalekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ollison v. Village of Climax SpringsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.