Legal Opinion

Unger v. Joy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review an order of the respondent which determined that a certain apartment was not subject to control, the petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 3, 1978, as dismissed the petition. The appeal also brings up for review that portion of the judgment as denied respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as time barred (see Town of Massena v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 45 NY2d 482, 488). Judgment reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Massena v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Furey v. MilgromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Kaufman v. AnkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Hawk Sales Co. v. DietemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tilcon New York, Inc. v. Town of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Katz v. AssessorNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Frasier v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API