Dortch v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STURGIS, Chief Judge.
Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying his motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix to vacate a judgment convicting him of a felony. He alleged by the motion that he was indigent and not represented by counsel at any stage of the trial proceedings, and *410the state did not fi-le an answer or present any evidence in opposition thereto.
The order reveals that the court was of the opinion that the merits of the motion and the grounds thereof did not warrant the production of the prisoner (appellant) at the hearing thereon. Denial is based on a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rice v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gargan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Mason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Carver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Laneiro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965