Legal Opinion

Clifford v. Groseclose

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1918No. 8103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Beaver County ; W. C. Crow, Judge. Action- by R. M. Groseclose against T. Clifford and others to enjoin a sale under execution and to set aside a judgment rendered against him bv a justice of the peace in his action against Clifford. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

R. M. Grose-close instituted suit in the justice court against T. Clifford to recover a judgment upon a promissory note for $94.75, with interest and attorney fees. Clifford filed an answer in the justice court admitting the execution and delivery of the note, but alleged that the plaintiff therein was indebted to him at that time in the sum of $28.50 for services performed by him for said plaintiff which he asked to be offset against the note sued upon. And for further answer he alleged that said note was executed in payment of plaintiff’s services for cutting some wheat…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Long v. ShepardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Wagstaff v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. General Electric Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Ray v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Hudson v. ElySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bud Hoard Co. v. F. Berg & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Schichtel v. TurinskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API