State v. Dorsett
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Houston. Tried belovf before Hon. J. H. Reagan. Indictment for escape quashed upon motion.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
Voluntary and negligent escapes are made by the Statute distinct offences, created by different sections annexing different punishments. The former may be a felony, the latter can only be a misdemeanor. (Hart. Dig. Art. 549, 551.) The indictment charges that the defendant did “ wilfully and negligently” permit the escape. Wilfully is a word of equivalent, or a broader meaning than voluntarily. It certainly includes it. . If the word wilfully be stricken out of the indictment, it is a good indictment for a negligent escape, under Art. 551, of the Digest; and if, on the other hand; that' word…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Crow v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Nicholas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
- Cabness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Stebbins and McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
- People v. GillettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.