Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. Village Taxi Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 2017No. 2014-04993Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for violation of General Business Law § 340 (the Donnelly Antitrust Act), the defendants Village Taxi Corp., RC. Taxi Corporation, Luso American Taxi, Inc., Pedro Montoya, Yodna Vivanco-Small, and Zoila Ivarra appeal, and the defendant Anean Goyburu Corp. separately appeals, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), dated March 31, 2014, as, upon the denial of that branch of their motion which was pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the causes…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Stutman v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Penn-Ohio Steel Corp. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API