Coggins v. State

The defendant was convicted of making intoxicating liquor, and he excepts to the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

*660The evidence shows presence and flight, 'and that the defendant had some kind of vessel in his hand. In the case of Griffin v. State, 2 Ga. App. 534 (2) (58 S. E. 781), it was held that “neither presence nor flight, nor both together, without more, is conclusive of guilt;” and that case is cited approvingly in the two cases next herein referred to, where the offense charged was that of making intoxicating liquor. In Burchfield v. State, 40 Ga. App. 506 (150 S. E. 459), the…