Howe, Snow, Corrigan & Bertles v. Vander Veen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Cross (Orien S.), J. Assumpsit by Howe, Snow, Corrigan & Bertles against John A. Vander Veen for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.
In this case judgment was entered for defendant upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
“"November 19, 1920, the defendant gave the plaintiff an oral order to purchase for him 100 shares of Holland-St. Louis Sugar Company stock for the sum of $1,300. On the same day plaintiff mailed a confirmation of the order to the defendant. Plaintiff purchased the stock and sent the certificate with draft attached to a bank in Holland, where defendant re» *574sided, but same was not presented to the defendant until January 9, 1921.
“After ordering plaintiff to purchase said stock, defendant…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Kernahan v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933