Legal Opinion

Home Loan Co. v. Calhoun

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1925No. 6 Div. 428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill was to settle a disputed boundary line between city lots, and resulted in a decree for complainants.

The law of such case is well established in this jurisdiction. Turner v. De Priest, 205 Ala. 313, 87 So. 370. The rule of adverse possession is that—

“Where adjoining landowners claimed and held the land to a line which they believed to be the true line, not intending to hold beyond the true line such claim and possession of the one is not adverse to the rights of the other if the line was not in fact the true line; .however if they intended to hold to that line regardless of whether or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Hess v. RudderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Gibson v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Upton v. ReadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Hodges v. SandersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Atkins v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API