Legal Opinion

Crusius v. Illinois Gaming Board

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 2004No. 1-02-2819 RelPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBRIDE

At issue in this case is the constitutionality of section 11.2(a) of the Riverboat Gambling Act (230 ILCS 10/11.2(a) (West 2000)), which allows “[a] licensee that was not conducting riverboat gambling on January 1, 1998[, to] apply to the [Illinois Gaming] Board for [license] renewal and approval of relocation to a new home dock location.” Illinois citizen and taxpayer Philip N. Crusius filed an action on behalf of all Illinois taxpayers and the State of Illinois seeking a declaratory judgment that section 11.2(a) violated the constitutional ban on special legislation (Ill. Const. 1970, art.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Greer v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. La. Paddlewheels v. La. Riverboat GamingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Chicago National League Ball Club, Inc. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Peoria School District No. 150 v. Peoria Federation of Support StaffIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Beary Landscaping, Inc. v. LudwigDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Guns Save Life, Inc. v. AliAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  4. Crusius Ex Rel. Taxpayers of the State of Illinois v. Illinois Gaming Bd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. P & S Grain, LLC v. County of WilliamsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API