Legal Opinion

United States v. James Knight

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1982No. 80-5118PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon the original appeal by Knight from his conviction for conspiracy, fraud and interstate transportation of stolen property, this court concluded there had been a sufficient showing of a conflict of interest on the part of Knight’s trial counsel to require further inquiry. Following the procedure which the Supreme Court resorted to in Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 101 S.Ct. 1097, 67 L.Ed.2d 220 (1981), we remanded Knight’s case to the district court for a determination of whether any actual conflict existed and, if so, whether Knight was prejudiced thereby. United States v. Taylor, et al.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Robert "Bobby" Taylor (80-5117), James Knight (80-5118), Wayne Drewry (80-5119)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Betty Lou Beets v. Wayne Scott, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Peter CancillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Epperson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kinser v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Moseley v. ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API