Dennard v. State

1. This case is controlled hy the ruling of this court in Browning v. Waycross, 11 Ga. A.pp. 46 (74 S. E. 564); and the judge (who, hy agreement of the parties, tried the ease without a jury) did not err in adjudging the accused to he guilty.

2. The affixing of lightning-rods to houses is a business of purely local character and exclusively within the control of the State authority; and, although under the terms of the contract the purchaser of the lightning-rods and fixtures had the option to affix them himself and at his own expense, it would be unreasonable to suppose that any person of…