Legal Opinion

Ademosu v. Phoenix Law PC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 31, 2023No. 3:23-cv-05404Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 ADEOFOLARIN ADEMOSU, CASE NO. C23-5404 BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 PHOENIX LAW PC, 11 Defendant. 12 13 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Adeofolarin Ademosu’s motion 14 for default judgment, Dkt. 8. The clerk has already entered default against defendant 15 Phoenix Law PC. Dkt. 5. 16 Ademosu alleges that he entered into a legal services agreement with The 17 Litigation Practice Group (LPG), agreeing to pay a monthly fee for “debt validation 18 services” and for “legal assistance in the event…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. CaridiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
  5. Valley Oak Credit Union v. Villegas (In Re Villegas)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API