Legal Opinion

Thos. S. Hayden Realty Co. v. Town of Aurora

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1917No. 9141PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Adams District Court. Hon. Harry S. Class, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

The sole question involved is whether ten judgments against the Town of Aurora, a municipal corporation, aggregating in excess of $431,000.00 are entitled to be included as a part'of its floating indebtedness under the *564terms “the floating indebtedness and outstanding legal warrants,” as used in chapter 144, page 308, Session Laws 1909, concerning the refunding of floating indebtedness and outstanding warrants of cities and towns, etc. It stands admitted that the Town of Aurora has complied with the provisions of this act, and is about to issue its bonds in order to take up its floating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Huron v. Second Ward Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. City of Port Huron v. McCallMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. New Orleans Board of Liquidation v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oakman v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API