Legal Opinion

Attorney-General ex rel. McKenzie v. Elliott

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 9, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

This case was argued before me, by consent, by way of rehearsal, in the hope of a speedy decision, which may be promptly reviewed. I will therefore not attempt an elaborate opinion, but will indicate shortly the conclusions I have reached.

First. I think the election of the defendant in May, 1907, if valid, could only have been for the unexpired term of his predecessor, and not for a new term of two years from the date of his own election. The act of 1900 (Pamph. L., p. 168) does not expressly define the term in case of an election to fill a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The People Ex Rel. Jackson v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connors v. City of BayonneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Mensone v. NJ Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Milton v. Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. State ex rel. Ervien v. MunozNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State ex rel. Jenkins v. SchnellerOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API