Legal Opinion

Fontana v. Post Printing & Publishing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Post Printing and Publishing Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 25th day of May, 1903, denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the service of the summons and corhplaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania,' and the plaintiff brought this action against it to recover damages for an alleged libel contained in a newspaper published by it in the city of Pittsburg, Penn. Service of the summons was attempted to be made in accordance with the provisions of section 432 of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to service upon a cashier, director or a managing agent of a foreign corporation within the State. The summons was delivered to one Eiker, who was in the employment of the defendant in the city of.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vitolo v. Bee Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beck v. North Packing & Provision Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Roehl v. the Texas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Loeb v. Star & Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Dimond-Warren Motor Co. v. Herff-Brooks Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  5. Doherty v. Evening Journal Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API